Generally Consenting for Chronic Nerve Pain and/or Nerve Damage

Nerve damage is a typically rare, albeit recognised complication that can arise from a number of different surgical procedures. Nerve damage can greatly vary in severity, from causing complete disability to temporary minor chronic pain.

Nerve damage can be caused by a number of factors, including:

  • Instrumental damage - for example caused by direct scalpel incision to the nerve and/or use of other instrumentation (such as those being used to maintain clear airways);

  • Restriction of oxygen to the nerves - for example by the application of a tourniquet, metalwork being inserted, and/or a blood clot;

  • Compression and stretching of the nerves - for example, this can be caused by a patients position whilst under general anaesthetic.

Cause of nerve damage can also be unknown and unexpected.

Whilst consenting for complex surgeries will always include nerve damage or chronic nerve pain, especially those focusing in or around nerve centres, this is often something overlooked for straight forward ‘simpler’ operations. This can cause a number of difficulties:

  • Managing patient expectations - patients often overlook the fact that wherever skin is opened surgically, there is a potential for residual chronic nerve pain from an incision site that was not previously there. Where expectations are not managed, this can result in a complaint or claim;

  • Defending a claim - where a patient has suffered nerve damage and includes this within a claim for clinical negligence, even if the nerve damage or chronic nerve pain may be due to a pre-existing condition and is not proven to be due to surgical complication, in the absence of clear consenting, it may not be possible to defend the claim.

For example, if a patient claims that they would not have proceeded had they been consented and told about the possibility of nerve damage, and went on to suffer nerve damage, in absence of clear consenting evidence, even if the damage may be a recognised complication, the claim will be difficult to defend in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015].

To assist with managing patient expectations, and to assist defending nerve damaged based claims, generalised consenting for chronic nerve pain and/or nerve damage should always be considered.

THEMIS Stand BOA 2025

THEMIS at the British Orthopaedic Association Conference 2025

This week, the THEMIS team had the pleasure of attending the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) Conference in Liverpool, and it was an inspiring few days for everyone involved.

Read More
THEMIS Stand

THEMIS at the RCOG World Congress 2025

We’ve partnered with the RCOG on a number of occasions, and this event gave us another brilliant opportunity to reaffirm our long-term commitment to supporting those working in this discipline.

Read More
Themis Representative Meeting

THEMIS and QBE Forge Strategic Partnership to Shape the Future of Medical Malpractice Indemnity

THEMIS is pleased to announce a five-year capacity agreement with QBE, one of the world’s leading insurers. This partnership reflects a shared commitment to providing the healthcare sector with a stable, robust, and future-focused indemnity solution.

Read More